I recently returned from the Annual American Osler Society meeting in Toronto where I presented a paper on Sir William Osler's support of the writing of the Medical Annals of Maryland, 1799-1899.
I thought I'd share the paper with you, along with my slides.
Eugene
Fauntleroy Cordell, MD:
Dr. William Osler’s Other, Other, Other Librarian
Miss Noyes was one of the
founders of the Medical Library Association, she edited their Bulletin and
subsequent publications, and worked at the Faculty until her death in 1946. Dr.
Francis was born in Montreal in 1878, and earned his medical degree from Johns
Hopkins University in Baltimore in 1902. After interning at Montreal's Royal
Victoria Hospital and spending some time in Europe to pursue postgraduate
studies, Dr. Francis returned to Montreal where he opened a practice in 1906.
However, there was a less well-known third librarian, Dr.
Eugene Fauntleroy Cordell, who was, among other roles and most importantly, the
author of The Medical Annals of Maryland, 1799-1899, published in 1903.
Dr. Cordell was born 1843, in
Charlestown, which was then in the state of Virginia, He was the son of Dr.
L.C. Cordell. He received his M.D. in 1865 from the University of Maryland.
He was a clinical reporter at the University Hospital, then
Attending Physician at the Baltimore General Dispensary. Dr. Cordell was one of
the founders and a Professor of Materia Medica and Therapeutics at the
Baltimore Women’s Medical College, beginning in 1882. His interest in medical
education helped extend the course of study from two to three years and led to
the standardization of medical schools and the organization of the Association
of American Medical Colleges in 1876.
Dr. Cordell twice became Librarian of the Medical and Chirurgical Faculty, and also served the standard one-year term as President. Along with Dr. Thomas A. Ashby, Dr. Cordell was the co-editor of the Maryland Medical Journal and frequently submitted articles on a wide range of topics.
When Dr. Cordell arrived as the
librarian of the Faculty in 1870, he found a collection of old books and
pamphlets in great disorder and of little value. The Faculty had gone dormant
during the Civil War, Maryland being a border state, and no work had been done
there for nearly a decade. Dr. Cordell began to reorganize the library and
increase its usefulness to the Faculty’s membership.
After a significant move into a larger building in 1895, Miss
Noyes found that in the intervening decade since Dr. Cordell had moved on, the
library had returned to its former state of disorganization.
Even though he was no longer the
librarian, Dr. Cordell understood there was that a significant amount of the
Faculty’s history tucked away in the library and the archives. Old membership applications,
and membership rolls from the early decades, letters to and from the secretary
of the Faculty, and so much more.
The idea of a centennial volume first arose during Dr.
Osler’s Presidential speech at the April 1897 annual meeting. A large and
influential committee was assembled and preliminary work began.
Throughout the centennial year of 1899, Dr. Cordell presented
snippets from his Annals, which would eventually run to “a portly 889 pages.” The
Annals included:
- · year-by-year history of the Faculty dating from Maryland’s settlement in the early 1600s;
- · biographies, some brief and some quite detailed, of every physician who practiced medicine in Maryland between 1799 and 1899; and
- · longer biographical sketches of distinguished members of the Faculty.
The work was beyond extensive. We have more than ten card file boxes, each with hundreds of postcards sent to thousands of physicians, who filled out their details and then returned the cards by mail. Some are handwritten and some typed, with information about each physician. It’s extraordinary to realize that all of this work was done without the help of Google, Newspapers.com or any digital source!
The short biographies included the physician’s name, date and place of birth, year they joined the Faculty, educational and professional accomplishments, various publications, and other relevant biographical details. If the physician was deceased, as the earliest ones were most likely to be, the date and place of the death was included.
The cards needed to be ordered,
either alphabetically or chronologically, and then transcribed onto a master
list, which was then put into the final manuscript. It is suspected that Miss
Noyes and her staff provided a great deal of help with this, and that the work
was actually completed at the Faculty’s building on Hamilton Terrace.
Dr. Cordell later said it included,
“a vast body of information collected from thousands of sources and extensive
correspondence.” It is, as the author intended it to be, "a volume which
will be regarded as authoritative in all matters relating to the medical
history of the State."
One of Dr. Cordell’s biggest regrets with the Annals was the complete and utter lack of documentation about the Faculty’s first meetings at the State House in Annapolis, Maryland. Dr. Cordell elegantly surmised how the Founders arrived at the first meeting in June of 1799.
“We may
fancy the founders preparing to sit in council, grave and reverend, deliberate
in act and speech, still clad in the antique style, wig, cue, frilled shirt,
high-necked coat with large brass buttons, knee breeches, stockings, shoe
buckles, and not least, gold-headed canes. Having alighted from coach and
stage, having disembarked from vessels which lay moored in the Severn River,
and having dismounted from their horses, we can imagine them assembling for the
business before them.”
Dr. Cordell suggested that the Centennial Committee write something to be left in the archives to be opened at the 200th anniversary of the founding.
“To feel
that we were in some degree in touch with them, and that through the long vista
of years we were thinking of them and their times, would certainly have been
proven an inspiring circumstance.”
Unfortunately, as far as I’ve
ever seen or understood, there was no such document left by the Centennial
Committee, except for the special centennial souvenir program, which includes a
“brief sketch of the Faculty’s first 100 years” which runs more than 25 pages.
In Harvey Cushing’s book on Sir
William Osler, several letters mention Osler’s frustration with the low number
of subscriptions to the Annals. Meanwhile the book continued to grow in scale. The
cost of the printing was significantly more than anticipated, and in the end,
Osler made up the entire deficit of two or three thousand dollars. While there
are no written records of this, and we do not have copies of the accounts from
that time, Osler settling the debt is mentioned in Cushing’s book.
In 1903-04, Dr. Cordell assumed
the office of President of the Faculty. In a note in 1903, Dr. Osler says that
the Committee should host a reception at the Faculty Hall for Dr. Cordell as an
appreciation for his centennial volume, “which by now had appeared, a somewhat
overgrown and expensive child for the committee of five who had fostered it.” A
reception and supper were held at the Faculty’s building.
A contemporary article about the
book and the reception in the Baltimore Sun states “The work is handsomely
bound. As evidence of the appreciation in which the faculty holds the work of
Dr. Cordell, he was presented with a certified check.” It is not stated who the
check was from. Possibly Osler?
Around the same time, Dr. Cordell was appointed as the first ever professor of the History of Medicine at the University of Maryland’s School of Medicine and got busy creating an endowment for the medical school.
Dr. Osler was one of the first to
make a donation, although most other contributors were faculty or alumni of the
University. During his Presidency of the Faculty and his time in Baltimore, Dr.
Osler worked to alleviate the animosity between the two largest medical schools
in the city.
It was Dr. Osler’s intention that
Dr. Cordell would profit from the sales and royalties of the book, and he did
what he could to support Dr. Cordell in myriad ways. It was always a source of
great regret that the low sales of the book deprived Dr. Cordell of an adequate
income for his long-time work on the volume. The book was and continues to be a
monument to Dr. Cordell’s dedication to the medical profession and his
unselfish devotion to historical work.
As an additional gesture of his gratitude, Dr. Osler commissioned a portrait of Dr. Cordell in 1911. The portrait was painted by Baltimore artist, Waldemar Franklin Dieterich, a second-generation portrait painter. It portrays Dr. Cordell in his academic robes with his hand on the Annals, his magnum opus. The portrait was presented at the Faculty’s annual meeting in April of 1912.
For the University of Maryland’s Centennial, Dr. Cordell researched, wrote, and published a two-volume history of the University’s School of Medicine, which was founded by members of the Medical & Chirurgical Faculty, hence, the Faculty. One volume focuses on the University’s history, influence, equipment and characteristics, and the other is solely biographical sketches of the University’s founders, benefactors, regents, faculty, and alumni.
A second and similar portrait of Dr. Cordell was commissioned by the University of Maryland School of Medicine on the occasion of their centennial in 1907, and was painted by the Baltimore artist, Irving Ward. The book in Cordell’s hand is possibly a copy of the University’s Centennial Volume.
Dr. Cordell continued to research and teach at the University of Maryland School of Medicine. After a brief illness, he died unexpectedly in August of 1913. The following year, the University, the Faculty, and friends put together a memorial fund in his name.
My sources are listed here.
No comments:
Post a Comment